April 30, 2008...2:27 pm

Native American Voters

Jump to Comments

American Indians are a forgotten group in the political arguments of the eastern establishment. A lot of Western states would also like to pretend they don’t exist. Despite the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924, many Indians could not vote in federal elections until 1956. State elections were even more off-limits. Maine and Arizona were the last hold-outs. So will Native Americans exercise their rights to vote, and if so, for whom?

An early Native American presidential forum attracted only three candidates, when there were a great many more in the race: Bill Richardson, Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel. It was a huge disappointment to Native voters.

Hillary Clinton had an American Indian policy early on, with eleven key points that included appointing Indians to key federal departments and bureaus, and not just those limited to the narrow field of “Indian Affairs,” but to offices dealing with mainstream issues. Native Americans also hope Clinton will implement a policy that was stalled by the Bush administration, to have more control over developing federal Indian policy. Since 2006, many western Native people have been behind Hillary Clinton.

Since Obama’s entry into the race, though, middle state and eastern Native Americans especially have opened up to his candidacy. While many wish he had an explicit policy on Native Americans and was not so negative about gaming, they are open to an Obama run. Obama has recently addressed issues such as health care on the reservations and has said he will appoint an annual meeting of tribal leaders, but he didn’t explain what effect or power that meeting would have.

Some Indians remain skeptical of promises by any candidate to include them, but their experience with Bill Clinton’s administration, while not 100% positive, was better than with many other administrations.

While gaming is not the only issue that interests American Indians, who also care a lot about the economy, health care, autonomy over their lands, tribal courts, education, the environment and many other issues, it is a critical issue because it is seen as perhaps the only chance for tribes to have access to the things named above.

TAHLEQUAH DAILY PRESS

The tribal gaming industry has grown exponentially in the past few years, but not all 2008 presidential candidates are supportive.
According to a recent article in the Los Angeles Times, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., has concerns about the “moral and social cost” gaming has on smaller communities. As a state senator in his home state, Obama sometimes opposed plans to expand gambling, worrying that it could be harmful to residents of low-income communities.
On the other hand, Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., embraces the gaming industry, and has supported her state’s efforts to lure new casinos to economically struggling communities outside New York City.

McCain is never even mentioned in the Indian press as a viable candidate despite his being from Arizona, or perhaps because of it.

Obviously Native Americans cannot decide a presidential election and so as a constituency, they are often ignored. But Native concerns should be issues that all Americans care about. In a state like Indiana, they make up only .3% of registered voters, according to CNN polls. Even in Oregon, they are 1.3% of voters. Yet American Indians have swung everything from local to large elections in states like Arizona, South Dakota, New Mexico, and Washington.

Native Americans suffer from terrible discrimination, despite the image white Americans bestow upon them in films and literature and pop culture. While 1 in 9 black men will go to prison between the ages of 24 and 34, and 1 in 154 white Americans will. Native peoples, in states where they make up a larger percentage of the population, can make up 25% of inmates. Since felony convictions often result in removal of the right to vote, minority populations remain at an even bigger disadvantage than whites. Having finally received an apology from Congress this year, one that was barely covered in the press, it remains to be seen whether politicians will notice the indigenous people of North America.

Montana’s primary is June 3. While hardly anyone is watching yet, it may be an important campaign. Six percent of Montana’s voters are Native American.

Sources: http://www.missoulian.com/articles/2008/04/06/jodirave/rave09.txt

http://www.reznetnews.org/article/election-2008/two-words-obama-didn%2526%2523039%3Bt-say:-native-americans

http://www.tahlequahdailypress.com/features/local_story_028160000.html?keyword=topstory

http://http://2008central.net/2007/08/23/american-indian-presidential-forum-attracts-only-3-candidates/

http://indiancountrynews.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3079&Itemid=1

The book “Native Vote” is published by the Cambridge University Press. For more information please visit: www.cambridge.org/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780521548717  

 

10 Comments

  • I am mixed race, part Indian but not on the rez. I hope Indians get out there and vote, because they will vote for Hillary. They know empty promises when they hear them and Obama is full of empty.

  • goodtimepolitics
    April 30, 2008 at 3:06 pm

    Good points! There isn’t that many full blooded Indians left so really would the young ones that are here now have any type of different opinion than a white or black person? Its funny, I don’t even think of a person being Indian or White anymore as we all seem to think and act the same! Maybe the blacks could take a lesson from the Indians on how to unite and get along in this great country of ours!

  • Goodtimepolitics, it’s true that Indians don’t get that involved in “race” but more on policy, because it’s policy that has done us in. The part of my family that is more African American is way more divided than the media says about AAs about Obama but probably going to vote for him.

  • The candidates should definitely be reaching out to them especially in South Dakota and Montana. I don’t think there has been enough done for the Indians and reservation conditions are deplorable. If Grant could appoint an Indian as Commissioner of Indian Affairs, you’d think someone in the 21st century might–but it’s important to have someone with a lot of integrity in tribal government.

  • On local elections I can see why the argument can be made for the Native American vote, but on a national stage they aren’t a very large player.

    I honestly feel that ONE of the largest problem in politics is this need to dissect the nation in to little categories and little pie charts.

    We all for the most part want the same thing.
    We want a free government that stays the hell away from my life, takes care of trade in a PROPER MANNER, and represents the people as a whole, not catered to a certain segment of the population.

    That is what local and state elections should all be about. Not National positions. Like President or Senator. Just do right by the people.

  • The reason national politics matters more to Native Americans is that we are domestic dependent nations, thanks to John Marshall. If national politics should matter to anybody, it’s us. The feds rule us. So we can’t make much difference in a national election, as in affecting the outcome, we can put what power we do have behind a candidate we think we can win and use our collective power. We have almost no state power ever.

  • Could Obama or Clinton recognize the 60% urban Indian vote?

  • I would agree, there is this tendency to divide up every minority group into its respective categories and then try and cater to that in the political rhetoric. However, once the person gets into office it is impossible to fulfill all of the promises given to each group - we should do it the other way. Let the candidate pick a stance and vote based on that, not on how they say they will act for each group.

  • Indian politics are a funny thing. As much as I dislike Obama, he does have a link on his website now. But I don’t know that he has “policy.” People always cringe when I say this, but Nixon had the only BIA in recent history that ran decently. His admin increased the BIA budget by 224% and doubled funds for Indian health care. Now, he was getting pressure from AIM and the Wounded Knee stand off, but he returned Blue Lake and 48,000 acres to the Taos Pueblo, 40 million acres to the Navajo Rez, and 21,000 acres to the Yakima, plus 60,000 acres to the Oregon Warm Springs tribe. But Indian “policy” is always at the whim of the President, and frankly, while I don’t believe Marshall’s decision about “domestic dependent nations” will every be overturned, it is the root cause of all these problems.

  • To goodtimepolitics, the Census figures from 2003 show only 2% of Indians are not “mixed.” This is creating problems for the Cherokee now, and the Congressional Black Caucus.

Leave a Reply